Valve Theory 101

Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum

Help Support Yamaha FJR Motorcycle Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Pterodactyl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
1,381
Reaction score
1,851
Location
Earth
I was recently having a discussion about valves with a friend who is as equally ignorant of the finer points of valve operations as I am. I thought where better to get our confusion cleared up than on this forum.

The basic question concerns how a valve becomes burnt. I understand that it is caused when a valve fails to seat properly for any of a variety of reasons. It has to do with the ability of the valve, particularly an exhaust valve, to transfer heat to the valve seat. So far, so good… I think. But here is where the confusion begins. Using just valve adjustment as the potential cause of a valve becoming burnt, under which condition is it most likely to occur? When the valve adjustment is too tight as measured between the cam and bucket, meaning the valve opens further than intended; or, when the valve adjustment is too loose, meaning the valve opens less than intended? And, how much more likely is it for an exhaust valve to burn than it is for an intake valve to burn given both are equally out of adjustment?

I knew I should have taken shop in high school.

 
When it's too tight, because eventually the clearance will be zero, which means it doesn't close when it should (during combustion).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And, to add to Fred's post, the intakes are also cooled

somewhat by the incoming air/fuel mixture whereas the

mixture is still quite hot as it begins to exit through the

exhaust port.

So yeah, an exhaust valve that doesn't seat properly,

therefore not able to transfer heat to the head, "burns".

 
Loss of compression, rough idle, loss of power output, back firing or misfiring. If bad enough it may not even start. All of this even after correctly adjusting the clearances.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This issue was far more common back in the day when we had cast iron valve seats (mid 60s cars/trucks) and dirty gasoline and oil that would generate carbon deposits. Regardless of the adjustment (most were hydraulics but many were manual), a bit of carbon would get between the valve a seat creating a leak that would "flame cut" the valve and seat, almost always the exhaust. Very common back then.

Fast forward to today and most modern engines have extremely hard valves and seats so leaky valves are very rare, unless the clearances are too tight as others have mentioned. Also, if the valve is being propped open when it is supposed to be closed, it is very likely that the cam lobe will get damaged since there is no room for a film of oil to generate.

Dan

 
What is the lowest limit of clearance for a valve before it start to burn or give problems ??

 
What is the lowest limit of clearance for a valve before it start to burn or give problems ??
When the valve no longer has any gap you are at the critical tipping point. Once there is *any* wear after the zero gap point the valve won't fully close letting burning combustion gas leak around the valve flute and that's going to be the end of the valve very quickly. One tip-off the exhaust valve clearance is getting very tight is improved high rpm performance
unsure.png
because the exhaust valve is open longer with higher lift. Hopefully there is enough valve/piston clearance that the early opening, high lift valve won't kiss the piston.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
^ this. But...

We make our valve clearance checks with stone cold (assume 60-70 degree F) engine. That is not necessarily representative of what happens at full-on engine operating temperatures, with the metals in the combustion chamber reaching into the hundreds of degrees.

Engine blocks are made from alumin(i)um alloys that have a higher expansion coefficient than the steel alloy valves. This means the blocks get bigger faster when heated than the valve stems do, resulting in closing valve clearances as an engine gets hotter.

Lele's question is a good one, but I don't think any of us have a definitive answer as to exactly when engine doom occurs, except to say that it is sometime (well) after one exceeds the factory valve tolerance specs (when cold).

The more salient point is that if you check your valves at the proscribed 25k(ish) mile intervals, and the valves check at or above the low limit when you measure them, you will be just fine. Which is the entire point of doing these check.

PS - ionbeam... you need a better back drop for your new sexy Gray Ghost's avatar than the boring old Sandown station. Find a nice lookin' mountain or sumptin'
wink.png


 
Last edited by a moderator:
k.

PS - ionbeam... you need a better back drop for your new sexy Gray Ghost's avatar than the boring old Sandown station. Find a nice lookin' mountain or sumptin'
wink.png
It's a place holder until I can find a classic NE/NH setting. If it ever quits raining I'll be on it :)

 
So what can result from a valve being too loose? Seems that is never an issue that pops up.

 
A little too loose just results in a tad more mid-range power. Really. Common practice back in the day with screw adjusted Kawasaki in-line fours was to run at (or slightly above) the loose limit.

That being said, you have to ask why is the clearance loose? Next shim down just a little thinner than it should be? Or has the cam lobe or follower worn? Never a good thing.

 
So what can result from a valve being too loose? Seems that is never an issue that pops up.
It can lead to pitting of the cam and/or the cam follower, the cam follower is "hitting" the cam at a steeper angle than the hardening was designed for.

I've seen the result, though this was 50-odd years ago, when materials and oil weren't as good as they are now.

 
If the clearances are set too wide then the valve lift and duration will be (slightly) reduced. This will slightly reduce the peak power available at high rpm, but as noted earlier can make the engine run smoother and stronger at lower rpms and mid range.

Too loose is a far safer situation, and valves on modern engines with shim under (hardened) bucket followers, like the FJR, tend to always wear in a way that reduces the clearances, which is one of the reasons why many folks will set their clearances to the wider end of the spec range. It also prolongs the need to re-shim, perhaps never requiring it again during the lifetime of the engine.

 
I think my engine is completely unbalanced due to different clearance between cilynders. (Within spec)

 
Top