FJR to Super Tenere, regrets, pluses
#1
Posted 07 October 2011 - 09:22 AM
#2
Posted 07 October 2011 - 09:39 AM
I mean if I had a choice between my feejer and a super10 to do the dalton highway I would probably take the super10 hands down... but for a cross country slab ride I would pick the feej.



"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
You are not paranoid if They are actually out to get you, however, They probably are not and you probably are.
2008 FJR1300 - 'Zoe'
#3
Posted 07 October 2011 - 09:42 AM
#4
Posted 07 October 2011 - 10:14 AM
#5
Posted 07 October 2011 - 12:00 PM
The FJR is effortless at speed, and in making speed. The S10 works to make speed, and sucks gas down at a significantly faster rate as you go over 65 mph. The FJR is much more consistent in mpg. The FJR has much better weather protection. The S10 has a more upright riding position that puts very little weight on the wrists, compared to the FJR.
At this point the FJR is completely dialed in, has a fully custom suspension and a custom Russell seat. It's frankly more comfortable than the S10, which is why I took it to the rally last weekend. Not to mention the fuel cell.
The FJR will likely go away. I really can't afford two bikes and I love the ergos and extra 4" of ground clearance on the S10. Part of why I bought it was because I was often taking the FJR places I probably shouldn't have been. I don't remember seeing singletrack in the FJR ads...
I'll miss the steady mpg, adjustable screen, better weather protection and more compliant, (custom GP), suspension of the FJR. I will need to get a custom seat on the S10, and I have a larger screen plus the oem side wings, but may need to buy an adjustable bracket for the screen. I don't think I'll really miss the power, as the S10 will move out nicely and it has been no big deal to pass or cruise at ton+ speeds. The suspension isn't fully dialed in yet, and I need to work on learning how to set it up better for me.
I will enjoy going places w/o a second thought on the S10. I will enjoy not worrying about the Alaska trip next year and the Haul road. I will probably end up adding a fuel cell, because you can burn though the 6.1 gallons of fuel in 200 miles or less with a head wind and interstate speeds.
Not sure why you want a S10 if your riding is all slab. The S10 is only a small amount lighter and while it is stable in the corners, the FJR is better at burning up the miles and hammering the twisties. Do keep in mind that the S10 does not come with bags, so you're going to be spending anywhere from $800 to $2k on bags and a rack to hold them. Tire sizes are different for the S10 and many of the options you're used to for Sport-Touring rubber are not available in the front tire size of 110/80R19. The rear 150/70R17 is easier to find in more options.
'12 Super Tenere
#6
Posted 07 October 2011 - 12:01 PM
slab, lotsa miles. I love my 06 fjr with 95k miles.
I don't have a S10, but I think you already know which may be better for your riding style by the description of your riding environment. Better wind/rain/cold weather protection on a FJR if lot of miles slabbing it.


#7
Posted 07 October 2011 - 12:37 PM
Nice Review... you might look at MadStad_Aeroflow for other Windshield options:...
I'll miss the steady mpg, adjustable screen, better weather protection... and I have a larger screen plus the oem side wings, but may need to buy an adjustable bracket for the screen...
http://www.advrider....=210188&page=84
http://www.madstad.c...ategory.1971/.f
Aluminum Adapter Plate and adjustable RoboBrackets - $199.95
Here is the MadStad ST Link:
http://www.madstad.c...ategory.3189/.f Due out sometime this month
#8
Posted 07 October 2011 - 01:31 PM
#9
Posted 07 October 2011 - 01:36 PM
There is a comparable bracket available now from various vendors as well. IIRC, $165. I have a CalSci Med size screen, but have been waiting for it to cool off to try. I rather like the oem screen for warm/hot weather. Thanks for the links.Nice Review... you might look at MadStad_Aeroflow for other Windshield options:
http://www.advrider....=210188&page=84
http://www.madstad.c...ategory.1971/.f
Aluminum Adapter Plate and adjustable RoboBrackets - $199.95
'12 Super Tenere
#10
Posted 07 October 2011 - 01:57 PM
Try and get a ride on a S10 at some point. It's a pretty firm ride. Yes, there is more travel, but my FJR is better by far at sucking up the bumps in the roadway. Granted, I'm still trying to figure out the suspension magic. (It was easy when I was in Oregon City, I just swung by GP and said "Hey Dave, help me set this up!" He understands that stuff so much better than I do.My interest in the dual sport, s10, is primarily the length of travel in the suspension to smooth out the bumps in the road.
I'm just thinking that if plush is what you want, I don't think the Tenere is going to be it.
'12 Super Tenere
#11
Posted 07 October 2011 - 02:15 PM
I'm just thinking that if plush is what you want, I don't think the Tenere is going to be it.
Concur...the Tenere comes with heavy springs in the front to handle the really big bumps, the ride isn't nearly as plush as the FJR.
#12
Posted 07 October 2011 - 02:25 PM
#13
Posted 07 October 2011 - 02:25 PM
#14
Posted 09 October 2011 - 04:48 PM
But as to the original question, I don't regret buying the S10 a bit.
It needs to be tailored to the owner like most any bike. The stock S10 windshield didn't work for me. But for long distances with the tall windshield, I don't feel as confined as I did on the FJR and the sit-up position is easier for me to do long distances. I arrive without the knee kinks, a more relaxed back, etc. The S10 will hustle down a twisty road quite well, obviously, the FJR is better for the job in the way that it launches out of corners and has more aggressive tires. An R1 could beat either.
I don't worry about tupperware anymore and don't have second thoughts like on the FJR about gravel or off-road. Going on gravel or off-road means buying a skid plate and bars, but that is just part of equipping it for how it'll be used. Turn off the traction control and you can wheelie it up onto a log if you have a plate. Never did well at wheeling a Beemer like that. Most people will probably never go off road, so those folks won't care. My FJR equivalent is that so few FJR owners kept the bike totally stock, feeling the need for a windshield, seat, etc. Again, it's just prepping the bike for the mission. Lessee, I paid a bit less than 12 large for the bike and about $440 for the bars and plate. It actually doesn't matter how much more a stripped GS would still cost, I'd still prefer riding the Yamaha.
The only biggie to me that I can't change is that the S10 could benefit from a crawler first gear on trails. I also miss the flash to pass switch from my FJR. (I got it off a European wreck and spliced the harness to install.)
A few less pounds would be nice, and to have the weight of the KTM Adventure would be ideal, but the seat-pegs-bars-ground relation of the S10 is FAR better, so I'll live with the extra pounds. How much more does it weigh? With fluids, it's between the R12GS and the GSA. The reality is that between the weight and proportions, I find it easier to get turned around when 3-point turning around on a single track in the woods.
#15
Posted 09 October 2011 - 05:19 PM
If I was going to use mine for lots of miles I would do much the same mods as I did to my FJR. Things like seat, different screen, throttle lock, etc.
Like has been said see if you can ride one first.
2001 HD softail
#16
Posted 10 October 2011 - 10:25 AM
At the time I picked up the Super Ten, I hadn't ridden the FJR for a bit. I was able to do a couple of hundred miles, then was out on the road for work again. I rode the ST the day I got back, then the FJR the next, and it was like learning how to ride all over again! My FJR has the stock seat and bars, and the seating position on the FJR is more "sport bike" whereas the ST is more like a mountain bike. The CoG is extremely low on the ST, which makes the FJR seem much more top heavy than it is. For me, the ST is much easier tipping into corners, and holding the line through. I also like the leverage afforded by the bars on the ST, they are so much wider that my arms are flatter when sitting (though I could use about an inch more height when standing). Bottom line, if I could only keep one bike, it would be the ST. Thankfully, I don't need to make that choice, as the rush of linear acceleration afforded by the right grip on the FJR is addicting (and better for dealing with the morons they give driver's licenses to in AZ).
IBA # 54462
#17
Posted 14 October 2011 - 04:27 PM
Since I just bought my FJR this year, finances need to re-coup for a bit, but in a couple years I'll probably be keeping my eye out for a used one. If this bike would have been in the showrooms in February when I bought my FJR it would have been a very, very difficult choice, although if I got a S10 I'd outfit it with knobbies and run dirt/fire roads as much as possible and would still want the FJR for cross country pavement trips and tearing up the canyons. I just need to win the lotto, that will solve all my problems!

IBA Member # 45611
#18
Posted 11 February 2012 - 04:51 PM
#19
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:58 AM

For context, the changes I've made to mine aren't very far from stock. All mods can be found on the Super Tenere forum, where a bunch of us ex-FJR types have moved:
Had a great tall windshield that broke just before the Alaska trip and attached photos.
Shorted clutch lever wire with a couple inches of wire, which removed the ECU engine power limit for the bottom 3 gears. Basically it is a "free" 15 hp boost.
Heidenau K60 tires. These are THE tire for this bike! Great on dirt, a blast in the curves, and people are running 15-20,000 miles. I've got 11,000 with LOTS of tread left.
Welded aluminum hard bags by Muffintop Industries on SW-Motech racks, and Givi 52L top box.
Seat slope mod (a set of Home Depot bumpers for less than $2 to flatten the seat.)
SW-Motech crash bars, now integrity tested on both sides.
SW-Motech bash plate, also tested.
Home cooked GPS mount above instrument cluster for Garmin Montana 600.
The bottom line is that the move to the Super Tenere was still right and it's a keeper.

Getting back on the FJR, the engine still has that addictive smooth rheostat power, and once moving the bike still had the great balance. It's still a great bike and I love the looks.
But the modded Tenere is no slouch and I'd MUCH rather do long distance on it, especially with the upright seating. Running gravel, wet wood bridges, etc are things that I did but did not enjoy with the FJR. The Tenere looks forward to them. The couple of times I've tipped it, nothing broke. No drama. Picked it up and rode off. I little Rustoleum gloss black on the crash bar and you'd never know.
Standing on the Tenere pegs is part of LD to me and much more natural on the Tenere. My lady prefers the big flat Tenere rear seat, calling the bike the 3rd member of the family.

As in my earlier post, the Tenere is heavier than I think they could have made it, but feels no heavier or more top heavy in use than any GS I've been on with boxes. While a stripped GS does feel lighter, though not by lots, did I mention a riding buddy's 12GS just ate a transmission at 36,000 miles? Or of the two I know with oil on the clutches? The first thing we saw when pulling into Hyder, Alaska, last month was a 1150GS with the tool kit out and side cover removed. I still rent the BMWs and they ride fine but their lack of reliability still bothers me. I never ever have a concern on any of the Yamahas.
This thing ROCKS!
#20
Posted 09 July 2012 - 03:02 PM











