FjRandy,
No, thank you, I already own a Harley, don't need a new one. My 1991 FLHTCU has >85,000 on the clock, ORIGINAL top end, bottom end, and everthing in-between. Except consumables. No issues. Just oil and gas and lots of smiles and miles. Although it did take more hours to get that mileage accumulated than it would have on a FJ...
Oh, I also routinely ride a host of other makes too, American, German, European. I am not a bigot of any one manufacturer; if it has two wheels AND an engine, I'll try it, ride it. Bicycles, NOT!
Don't let the *only* 85k on the '91 HD surpise you; it's only one of several I routinely commute with at over 100 miles / day, rain or shine. They too have similar mileage. To be clear, I am not an IB guy - too many mx injuries over the many years.. can't ride the true crotch rockets anymore due to neck/back issues.
Which is why I love the FJR concept; fast, great handling, more up-right riding position, bags, great looking.... it's all good, and its new! I've always liked the FJ series, all the way back to '84; my best bud had an 84? FJ and I was riding my my 79' Kz1300.. He was very hard to keep in sight and I loved to ride his air cooled FJ. Now my local dealer has a new 05 FJ, I saw it, sat on it, and fell in love again. I truly want this bike to work for me.
I had the same burn for my Kz1300 as I do for the Fj.. too late I discovered that the Kz came out of the factory with out-of-round cylinders. Kawasaki NEVER acknowledged, or fixed this problem. Repair costs? Terrible. Oil consumption? 'Normal' at 1 qt per 150 miles. Eventually, the factory 'advoidance' campaign worked well... they just quit producing the bike, made their profit margin and produced 'new' bikes...
I don't know, maybe I've read waaaaay too much into the FJR valve guide problem.. but it seems to me that after, how many years?, 2,3? that Yamaha would do something more PROACTIVE than just wait for the customers to bitch. Sometimes a simple admittance of accountability and proposed corrective actions solve everything.
The Kawasaki, like the Fj, had a limited audience... the factory knew they would sell every bike produced, not matter what the issues, and therfore did not worry about addressing the issues. It seems like Yamaha is doing better than Kawasaki, in that they are fixing the problem Tick bikes, but why, after all these years, are they still appearing?
It seems to me that Yamaha would be very concerned about guys just like me... Folks who really want to buy the bike but are concerned about a very well documented issue; who may not buy based upon the (lack) of response from the factory.
I am very interested to hear what other FJ owners have to say - is the bike *that* good overall that you would *again* purchase new, even given the chance that you would experience the TICK problem and resultant down time, hassle with the factory, etc?
And I'm especially interested to hear from those who have had to go through the agony of having their bikes fixed.. would you buy again?
Most importantly, I'm hoping that Yamaha is listening... and will step up to the plate and resovle this issue once and for all...
Sincerely,
dcarver
and sorry if I've 'ticked' anyone off (gawd I just can't resist a bad pun) :bigeyes: